The Three Types of Contradictions (Which One Do You Have?)

In the last video, we talked about the gap between knowing and doing—that painful experience of acting against your own wisdom.

And I said that this gap isn't random. It follows patterns.

In this article, I’m going to show you the three specific patterns. There are three types of contradictions, and I can almost guarantee you're experiencing at least two of them right now. By the end of this post, you'll be able to diagnose your own contradiction patterns with precision.

Not vague self-awareness, but clear, specific understanding of exactly what's happening. And that precision matters. Because you can't solve a problem you can't see clearly.

So let's get specific.

Type 1: The Values-Actions Gap

The first type is the Values-Actions Gap.

This occurs when you clearly know what matters to you—you can articulate your values effortlessly—but your actions consistently conflict with those values. This is the most common form of contradiction, and often the source of the most shame.

Consider your health. You intellectually understand that your body is important. You know that exercise, good nutrition, and sleep matter. And yet, you don't exercise regularly. You eat foods that don't serve you. You stay up too late scrolling your phone.

It's not that you don't value health. You absolutely do. But if someone looked only at your actions—not your intentions—they would conclude that you don't value it at all.

We see this in relationships, too. You value deep connection, yet you cancel plans or stay surface-level in conversations. We see it in learning; the books you buy sit unread, and the courses you purchased remain unfinished.

The Cost:

Here's what makes this type of contradiction so painful: You're not confused about what you want. You know what you value. But somehow, that knowledge doesn't translate into consistent action. Every time you act against your values, you accumulate a little more self-doubt—a little more evidence that you can't trust yourself.

Self-Reflection: Where in your life do you clearly know what matters, but your actions don't align?

Type 2: The Understanding-Application Gap

The second type is the Understanding-Application Gap.

This is distinct from Type 1. With Type 1, the problem is translating values into routine actions. With Type 2, the problem is applying your understanding in the moment it matters—especially under pressure.

Take communication, for example. You might understand healthy communication principles perfectly. You know you should use "I" statements, listen without interrupting, and stay curious rather than defensive. You could probably teach a class on it.

And yet, when you're actually in a conflict and emotions are running high, all of that knowledge evaporates. You snap. You interrupt. You get defensive. Afterward, you think: "Why did I do that? I know better."

This isn't about ignorance. You aren't lacking information. The problem is that under pressure, you cannot access that knowledge. It’s like knowing the theory of how to swim but still sinking the moment you fall into the water.

Self-Reflection: Where do you understand the principle intellectually but fail to execute it emotionally under pressure?

Type 3: Complex Decision Paralysis

The third type is Complex Decision Paralysis.

This is fundamentally different from the first two. With Types 1 and 2, you generally know what you should do; the problem is doing it. With Type 3, the problem is that you have multiple important factors, and you can't figure out how to integrate them into a decision.

This is not laziness or indecision. It is an integration problem.

Career Decisions:

You're trying to decide whether to take a new job. The new position offers money and status (which matters). Your current job has work-life balance and relationships (which also matters). Then there is the question of long-term growth and family impact. You aren't lacking information—you've made the spreadsheets. You are stuck because you don't know how to weigh these competing factors.

Life Transitions:

Should you move cities? Change careers? End a relationship? Every option has merit, and every option has costs. This isn't a simple choice between "good" and "bad." It is a complex choice between multiple goods, each with different costs.

With Type 3, you are trying to solve a complex integration problem with just your conscious mind, and your conscious mind gets overwhelmed. You don't need more clarity; you need a system for integration.

Self-Reflection: Where in your life are you facing a complex decision involving multiple important factors, where you have the information but can't integrate it into a clear choice?

Most People Have All Three

If you are reading this and thinking, "I have all of these," you are not alone.

Most people have all three types happening in different areas of their lives. You might have a Values-Actions Gap around health, an Understanding-Application Gap around communication, and Complex Decision Paralysis around your career.

This is normal. It is not a sign that you are broken.

However, recognizing which type you're dealing with in each area is critical because each type has a different root cause.

• Trying to solve a Values-Actions Gap with more information doesn't work.
• Trying to solve an Understanding-Application Gap with more analysis doesn't work.
• Trying to solve Complex Decision Paralysis with more willpower doesn't work.

The Next Step

Now you can diagnose your patterns. But here is the question you are likely asking:

"Okay, I can see my patterns now. But why haven't the obvious solutions worked? Why hasn't willpower fixed my Values-Actions Gap?"

That is exactly what we cover in the next installment of this series. Once you understand why the obvious solutions fail, you'll understand why the Contradiction-Free Living framework acts as a different kind of solution.

Explore More

• Get the Book: For the complete framework, you can get the book here
• Subscribe: Ensure you receive the next part of this series by subscribing to the newsletter

About This Series:

This is the second article in a 10-part foundation series on Contradiction-Free Living. Each article corresponds to a video exploring one aspect of the framework—a systematic approach to closing the gap between your values and your actions using ancient wisdom adapted for secular practice.

About the Author:

Phani Kandula is the founder of Contradiction-Free Living, a framework for sustainable excellence and emotional equanimity.